|
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ |
|
|
Jackdmp Todo list
|
|
|
Jackdmp Todo list
|
|
|
--------------------- |
|
|
--------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 Optimize activation call graph with multiple clients in a process: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 Optimize activation call graph with multiple clients in a process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrzej Szombierski recently did interesting test to measure jack client activation speed in different context: jack client opened in separated processes, multiple jack clients running in the server, multiple jack clients running in a same separated process, this using jackd or jackdmp. |
|
|
Andrzej Szombierski recently did interesting test to measure jack client activation speed in different context: jack client opened in separated processes, multiple jack clients running in the server, multiple jack clients running in a same separated process, this using jackd or jackdmp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Also having multiple clients in a same process (jack server or separated process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(and this would be done recursively following a sequential path in the graph until no more client in the same process is found) |
|
|
(and this would be done recursively following a sequential path in the graph until no more client in the same process is found) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is still an issue if a client uses the "Fons special" ((-: new jack_thread_wait API, where a client explicitly gives control back to libjack... I still don't have a clear idea if this optimization path could still be done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is still an issue if a client uses the "Fons special" ((-: new jack_thread_wait API, where a client explicitly gives control back to libjack... I still don't have a clear idea if this optimization path could still be done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if the "multiple clients" way is not really used in existing applications, is it a desirable feature to have at some point? |
|
|
Even if the "multiple clients" way is not really used in existing applications, is it a desirable feature to have at some point? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|