Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

The drawbox video filter is drawing lines one pixel thinner than
requested. The default thickness is 4 pixel but in fact the lines
drawn by default are only 3 pixel wide.

Change the comparisons in the code to fix this off-by-one bug. Also
change the default thickness from 4 to 3 to minimize the unexpected
changes from the user's perspective.

As I was already touching these lines, I also removed the "maximum" in
the thickness parameter description, as I don't think it was adding
any value and I even found it confusing.

Reviewed-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

Do not overwrite the variables set through AVOptions.

This is shorter and consistent across filters.

With the introduction of AVFilterContext->is_disabled, we can simplify
the custom passthrough mode in filters.

This commit is technically a small compat break, but the timeline was
introduced very recently.

Doxy by Stefano Sabatini.

Flag added in a few simple filters. A bunch of other filters can likely
use the feature as well.

Conflicts:

	libavfilter/avfilter.c
	libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c
	libavfilter/vf_lut.c
	libavfilter/vf_select.c
	libavfilter/vf_setpts.c
	libavfilter/vsrc_color.c
	libavfilter/vsrc_movie.c

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

Deprecate AVFilterBuffer/AVFilterBufferRef and everything related to it
and use AVFrame instead.

Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

Any alleged performance benefits gained from the split are purely
mythological and do not justify added code complexity.

Fixes CID741419
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

Based on a libmpcodecs/vf_rectangle.c feature.

A number of compilers, for example those from TI and IBM, choke on
these initialisers.  The current style is also quite ugly.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>

Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>

It is not used in any filters currently and is inherently evil. If
passing binary data to filters is required in the future, it should be
done with some AVOptions-based system.

It will allow adding new fields to it without ABI breaks.

They are only useful inside filters and we don't allow user filters for
now.

It is only useful inside filters and we don't allow user filters for
now.

Those functions are only useful inside filters. It is better to not
support user filters until the API is more stable.

GCC 4.6.2 at least still seems to fail to put them in .rodata though,
see also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37303

Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>

Done to keep ABI compatible. Otherwise this is just silly

It is pretty hopeless that other considerable projects will adopt
libavutil alone in other projects. Projects that need small footprint
are better off with more specialized libraries such as gnulib or rather
just copy the necessary parts that they need. With this in mind, nobody
is helped by having libavutil and libavcore split. In order to ease
maintenance inside and around FFmpeg and to reduce confusion where to
put common code, avcore's functionality is merged (back) to avutil.

Signed-off-by: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>